Consciousness is a profoundly
relevant aspect of life. The distinct presence is of course relevant, because
without it, a being is either dead, or in a deep dormant sleep. But the degree
and quantity of which consciousness is applied, seems as though it should also
be considered quite important. I believe with a better comprehension of
consciousness, the understanding can be applied to be beneficial –as with most
concepts-. The degree of consciousness is perhaps typically understood as being
divided into 3 generalized categories, being; fully-conscious, subconscious,
and unconscious.
From my understanding, the category
of conscious would be considered to be distinguishably unique to human beings.
I see consciousness as a gift to be very grateful for –whether you believe in
God or not-, as without it the world would seem very dry, shallow, meaningless,
and potentially completely pointless. To be outright conscious, is to be aware
and capable of comprehension, understanding and retaining knowledge (at least
as far as I am aware). Any animal (at
least on Earth, and to our knowledge), may be considered conscious, but that is
only in the more generalized distinguishment between conscious or unconscious.
In those terms, it refers to the animal of being awake, and is conscious, but
only to the (considerably) lesser degree of subconscious, when evaluating at
that more specified degree of consciousness.
Subconsciousness would be the
capability of an entity to have a reaction -which is controlled by a
preconditioned memorial system- to an effect (At least that is the most
accurate definition, from what I can understand at the moment and relay into
words). This would not include most awake, calm, and alert humans, because
–being fully-conscious- their reactions are controlled by an over-writing,
predominant, active action decider system, rather than the preconditioned
memory system (ie. part of the brain). And this would not include unconscious
entities or inanimate objects, because their reaction is controlled by the
default of reactions, being the laws of physics, rather than a memory system. By
my assumptions, subconscious would include: -Animals which are awake,
-Humans which are sleeping –but in
the shallow state of dreaming-
-Humans temporarily inattentive or influenced
by an external effect -to a point of lack of active decision capability (ie.
Drugged, nutrient deprived)
-Humans underdeveloped in the
reaction control system (ie. Children, mentally ill)
-last (and maybe least), theoretically
by my standards- computers (until we develop them to the point of active,
comprehending processing, where as they would become outright conscious and
virtually capable equivalent in most relevant aspects to humans).
There seems to be a surprisingly
distinct line between subconscious and outright conscious. Considering no other
animal has crossed the line of fully (or at least as full as we know it for now)
consciousness, in which the ability is gained to problem solve, adapt
momentarily to changing circumstances/ surroundings, and intentionally/
purposefully alter variables. These abilities, gained through our consciousness
have of course allowed humans to completely overpower and reign over every
other animal (of equal opportunity but lack of that one aspect of life).
The line between consciousness and
subconsciousness is actually crossed almost every day by every living person,
multiple times. It is crossed every time you fall asleep -switching to
subconscious (until you’re in a deep enough sleep to no longer dream and be
technically unconscious)-, and vice versa. It’s crossed every time you get
drunk enough to lose control, then back again when you sober up. And, perhaps
most commonly (and… perhaps not so distinctly of a line after all), every time
you lose focus or stop paying attention to what you’re doing, to enough of an
extent that you’re not aware of what actions you are making. This actually
likely happens numerous times throughout the day, with many repetitive tasks
being acted upon without regard as habit and routine. This isn’t necessarily a
bad thing, as most of the time your subconscious reactions will be the most
beneficial reaction. But, where understanding of all of this comes in to be
potentially productive and constructive application with positive outcomes, is those
circumstances where a conscious decision would be superior to a subconscious
reaction.
The benefit of consciousness is
often differential distinguishment (as I’ve come to remember it). Where in, you
have the ability to actively distinguish minor differences in a scenario, in
which a subconscious reaction has not developed that distinguishment through
its inferiorly slow-learning process of conditioned memory reaction. This extra
capability of distinguishing those minor differences, acquires the benefit of
acting more accurately to the current set of circumstances, by analyzing the
probable effect caused by those differences which were detected.
If you can understand these
properties of consciousness, perhaps you can perceive the potential positives
and take advantage of having consciousness comprehended.
No comments:
Post a Comment