Prequel Chance, Equal Enhance

All should be considered equal! Right? Taking that as an absolute, would seemingly be quite drastic in reality. But, after analysis of pride, it seems all alternative individuals should be considered no less important than you. And after questioning contribution, it seems it is generally beneficial. Therefore contribution to the equal distribution of all personal resources to others (being of equal value) would seem logical. The idea of others being considered of the same value, has got me wondering; to what extent should support of others, or perhaps contribution to a grander prospect, spread? I think an understanding of equality in value of others is necessary (as understood from negating pride), as well as equality in opportunity of circumstances.

Theoretically, if all other individuals are considered of equal value to you, all others should also have the same quantity of resources. You would then relay all efforts and gained resources to any and all alternate individuals with less resources. This is a plausible theory, but living this way in absolute would be an extremist lifestyle –though some people do choose this-, and would seem unnecessarily selfless, as you would end up only supporting yourself with the bare minimum resources for sustaining your life, while giving everything to all others with even the slightest lower amount. To keep the extent of generosity to a less extreme and seemingly more reasonable degree, perhaps a better understanding of equal opportunity is necessary.

Assuming all individuals are of equal value, a method of determination of quantity of each individual is required. Typically you’d measure the quantity of resources each individual has, to compare potential current equality, and therein adjust the quantity of resources from one to the other in attempt to allow all to become equal by quantity of resources. But, with the constant in this situation being humans, the added variable of free will and choice should be taken into account. Considering all individuals have the option off free will, affecting the quantity of resources they have, the quantity to be measured in order to compare equality, should perhaps be opportunity rather than resources. By comparing opportunity that each individual had to begin with, this accounts for the individuals’ variable of free will, since accumulated resources would be varying as the current quantity based on what that individual chose to make of the beginning opportunity of circumstances, as well as ongoing opportunitial circumstances. Comparing opportunity therefore, would be a more accurate analysis to determine overall equality in alternate individuals being valued equally. 

Precise, specific circumstances of opportunity of others can never be known, leaving only an assumed estimation of what opportunities they have had. If you consider all alternate individuals which have had an estimatedly, generally equal opportunity as yourself in life, as being in equal position, then regarding them as equal value would generally not imply relaying resources or efforts towards them to any degree above yourself. Instead others of estimated less beginning opportunity would be the only ones to require adjustment of resources in their direction, in order to attempt equal current position of all constants of the same value.

Evaluating initial opportunity then becomes the necessary determinant in order to attempt to make all those values in this world equal.