Relevant Route of Decision Direction

In the scenario where someone's will is for God to allow something which is also of his will, God would need to allow the circumstances where everyone makes the relative decision which is required for the alteration of conditions to occur. There may be 10 people required to make certain decisions, for a certain circumstance to occur. For each of those 10 people to make that decision, there might have been 100 necessary circumstances to occur. For each of those 100 circumstances, there might be 10 other people required to make certain decisions. Its unlikely that it would stop there, but for eg, this would already be 10 x 100 x 10 = 10 000 people required to make a certain decision, in order for 1 circumstance to occur.

But, for 10 people to make those initial certain relevant decisions, there could be 100 people who could potentially take that role. This means there only needs to be 1/10 people to be willing for God to influence their decisions. Now, considering my next estimate of 100 circumstances necessary to make that influence on that decision, it seems plausible that a lot of decisions would only require 1 circumstance for effective influence*. The next 10 people relevant to their decisions causing that circumstance, would be the same as the 1st set of 10 (only needing 1/10 people to will God to influence their decisions). This brings the equation to 10 x 1 x 10 = 100. But out of those 100, only 1/10 need to be willing for God to influence their decisions

*Why should it be assumed that most decisions would only require 1 or few circumstances? A lot of decisions seem like they’re made regardless of most circumstances. Once a set of principles or rules of effective lifestyle are learned in an individual's life, those rules tend to be the relevant influencing circumstances on nearly all decisions. Therefore, for an individual to be influenced to make a specific decision, few circumstances should need to be altered, as it seems nearly all decisions would be made based on the overruling principles of that individual's decision process. That decision process could be tweaked by minimal occurring circumstances.

Considering all individuals whose decisions would be altered -without the reduction of free will- based on their will for God to alter it, would be of a similar lifestyle, they would likely be of a similar set of principles for basis of decisions. Since all decisions seem to be influenced by the same set of circumstances (ie the development of a set of principles to base decisions on) for each person, and all people relevant to alteration of decisions, seem to have a similar set of principles, if all influences of decisions were to be based on that same set of principles, then the required influence would always already have been applicated.

If God's will is for us to gain the principles of his way of life, and to make decisions based on those principles, and the only alterations God makes to influences on human decisions, are to those of people who are willing for God to alter their decisions based on his will, then no alterations to circumstances of your past (which influence your decisions) would be necessary, as the circumstances would always be the same, since the set of principles would be the same.

If everyones will was for Gods will to occur, then all those decisions would be made. If that is not their will, then there’s a chance they might not make that necessary decision. God would have to either alter their decision and reduce their free will, or predict that occurrence, and readjust the initial variable starting setup until they do make the decision.