Judgury

Judging someone is typically considered to be a bad thing. But I wonder; is it to all extents and if not, to what degree? The 1^st thing to understand might be what judging specifically is, exactly. I suppose one way to describe it would be; making a determination of the value of someone or something, to a rated degree of positive or negative. When stereotypically judging someone, the variable being judged is the individual themselves. Alternatively, more reasonably and realistically, the variable to be judged could be the action or presentation.

It seems fair to have an opinionated valuation of the degree of negativity of an action, as certain actions are fairly accurately distinguishable for having a negative impact or effect on either the variable performing the action, or the alternate variables effected by the action (whether intended to be effected or not). Therefore, the value of that action could be considered negative. All differing types of actions would have a different degree of potentially acceptable and understandable negativity valuation, and each type of action would also differ depending on the specific circumstances and minor variable differences. Actions on the higher degree of obvious negativity (often including actions with the negative attribute agreed upon by the performer) should therefore be more fairly accepted as a theoretically, conclusively, judged negative action. These actions could theoretically be considered universally incorrect (if correctness is understood as being beneficial). Potentially some aspects that may be judged upon another are based on personal opinion and preference. Therefore, to make a definitive evaluation these aspects that are opinionated and respectively indefinite, is illogical.

Even though theoretically some actions, which are to higher degree of acceptably, regarded negative value, the individual themselves performing the action should not be held definitively accountable to be valued negatively in respect to their action, in all seemingly fairness. An action itself can be commonly interpreted as being definitive, considering the outline of the action from beginning to end, as well as all potentially minor variables effecting the action, are typically, generally graspable and regardable. Whereas on the other hand, the individual performing the action cannot be seemingly definitive, considering the profoundly vast and various aspects and variables relating to the individual, are too complex to grasp or ultimately understand (for humans). This is why, logically; no definite valuation of another person should be made.

In conclusion,,, don’t judge!

May 10, 2015